MINUTES - ECS SENSOR DIVISION Sunday, October 22, 2000 - Phoenix
Executive Committee - Sunday Evening Planning Meeting
Note on this version: This document was placed here as a draft, which needs to be approved at the next meeting in Washington, March 2001. If this statement is still visible here after March 2001, it means the page was not updated. Unless a major change during the approval is made, this page is likely to stay in the draft format. If you see a major error contact Petr Vanýsek. Since he is going on sabbatical leave to work with a company and may not be readily accessible, you may want to contact the web master of the main page instead.
1. The minutes of the previous Executive Committee Meeting were reviewed. Hesketh motioned to approve minutes and Stetter seconded. Approved unanimously.
2. Peter reminded everyone to attend the talk by Antonio J. Ricco, the winner of the Outstanding Achievement Award of the Sensor Division.
3. Treasurer's Report.
4. New slate of officers was approved.
5. Washington, DC meeting (abstracts due October 1, 2000).
6. Dick Crooks read Henry White's letter regarding elimination of Proceedings volumes. Cindy Bruckner-Lea reported that the issue of Proceedings is being discussed at high levels. Perhaps there will be special proceedings volumes that are not really proceedings volumes (they would be peer reviewed). Tony Ricco indicated that most of the money in the division comes from proceedings volumes. Henry Hughes passed out information about fund raising in DS&T. He said it cost more money to run a symposium than income generated. It was suggested that feedback on Proceedings volumes be sent to Cindy Bruckner-Lea
7. San Francisco Meeting (abstracts due April 2, 2001).
8. Philadelphia Meeting. There were to have been three symposia, but the symposium entitled Integration of Sensors and Electronics was canceled. Accordingly, there will be just two Sensor Division symposia at this meeting. The canceled symposium will be held in Salt Lake City.
Secretary's Note: at present the ECS web site indicates that the Sensor Division will be contributing to four symposia in Philadelphia: (1) Microfabricated Systems and MEMS VI (P.J. Hesketh, H.G. Hughes, W.E. Bailey, D. Misra, S.S. Ang and J.L. Davidson); (2) Sensors for Semiconductor Process Monitoring Applications (P. Vanysek and E.B. Stokes); (3) Chemically Modified Electrodes (B. Manson, B. Lennox, I. Taniguchi and P. Bartlett); (4) Sensor Technology for Industrial Systems and Energy Devices (J. Weidner and J.R. Stetter).
Henry Hughes indicated that he thinks we should have only one sensor symposium per
9. Salt Lake City meeting. It was decided to have a poster session at the
Salt Lake City meeting. There will be only two symposia at this meeting (IMCS joint
meeting won't happen).
Secretary's Note: at present the ECS website indicates that the Sensor Division will be contributing to the following symposia in Salt Lake City: (a) Solid State Ionic Devices III: Ceramic Sensors (E.D. Wachsman, S. Russek, M. Liu and F. Garzon); (b) Combinatorial Chemical Electrode Arrays in Electrochemical Systems (D. Gervasio and H. Budry); (c) an unnamed symposium co-sponsored by the Physical Electrochemistry Division and organized by Johna Leddy and Peter Hesketh; (d) Acoustic Wave Based Sensors (A.R. Hillman, T. Zellers, S. Martin and R. Cernosek)
Joe Stetter suggested we talk to other people running non-ECS sensor meetings and try to get them to coordinate with us on running joint symposia. He did this with IMOEN.
10. Paris. Preliminary discussion was held about potential symposia for the Paris meeting, but no decisions were reached and further discussion was deferred until the next meeting of the Executive Committee.
11. Henry Hughes suggested having just four separate symposia: Biosensors, chemical sensors, physical sensors, etc.
12. Peter ran a short course in Phoenix (microfabrication techniques).
13. Petr Vanysek indicated that he would like to have funds set aside for San Francisco- $4000. Tony pointed out that we need to keep all the income from the Proceedings volume as it keeps us afloat. Petr's requested was tabled until the Washington meeting.
14. It was suggested that the Transducer Research Foundation might provide some money for a symposium; especially student travel funds.
15. Petr suggested that there be some accountability of co-organizers so that we know who suggested which people to help with symposia. He indicated that there had been a serious problem with co-organizers from other divisions not contributing to symposia co-sponsored by the Sensor Division.
16. The Meeting was adjourned at 10:35 pm.
Minutes of Sensor Division Lunch and Business Meeting
Tuesday, October 24, 2000
1. Peter Hesketh called the meeting to order at 1:00 pm and introduced the head table.
2. Sensor Division Outstanding Achievement Award presented to Dr. Antonio J. Ricco - Congratulations Tony!
3. Nominations for officers read and nominations requested from the floor - there were none.
4. Tony Ricco made a motion to accept slate of officers, seconded by R. C. Hughes, and passed by vote of Sensor Division members present.
5. Peter reviewed upcoming symposia.
6. Peter read highlights from letter to Dick Crooks from Henry S. White (University of Utah) regarding Society Proceedings volumes.
7. There was a discussion regarding encourage student participation in the Division by providing awarded memberships. Petr Vanysek proposed a motion for up to 30 memberships for students in the Sensor Division. Motion passed by majority vote.
8. Request for input for Interface magazine and newsletter by Cindy Bruckner-Lea.
9. Hughes suggested lunch support for students to attend Sensor Division Lunch. Will be discussed at the next Executive Committee meeting in Washington DC.
10. The meeting was adjourned at 1:30 pm.
Web version prepared by Petr Vanýsek 29 January 2001. No electrons used in production of this document were harmed or injured in any way.